Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
us news world report rankings college 2012 - The use of a cellphone while driving is clearly risky, and physicians should counsel their patients to avoid this risky use while driving. What are the effects of cellphone use on ability to drive? There is a growing body of evidence, including methodologically sound studies of crash risk, that cellphone use by drivers substantially increases. May 01, · Many studies have documented the effects of talking on a cellular phone while driving, and many countries and individual jurisdictions have outlawed or limited their use, yet the usage rate of the devices remains high. For example, Wogalter and Mayhorn () found that 81% of their sample reported talking on a cellular phone while driving. Such a high rate of use may be Cited by: Mar 07, · Cell phone conversation does impact driving, with both a slower identification of hazards and a slower reaction time. Also, scanning the environment was diminished, drivers looked less to the left and right and in rear view mirrors. robb report best of the best jets
Custom Nationalism in India essay - Jun 18, · Half (52%) of cell-owning teens ages reported talking on a cell phone while driving in the survey. Among all adults, that translates into 61% who have talked on a cell phone while driving. That compares to 43% of all American teens ages who said they had talked on their phones while driving in the survey. In all, motorists were clearly observed, of which % were using cellular phones. Logistic regression analysis revealed that, phone driving was significantly associated with front-seat. Jan 01, · Moreover, studies clearly document that relative to driving without any phone use, cell phone use negatively impacts the ability to stay within one's lane and leads to an impairment in a navigation tasks, while conversations with passengers have few negative effects (e.g., McKnight and McKnight, , Strayer et al., , Dressel and Atchley, ). The Crusades of Western European Christians
Marketing Self Published Books - About 40% of people polled by the NHTSA said they talk on the cell phone while driving “regularly” or “fairly often.” Nearly 10% of people polled said they text and drive “regularly” or “fairly often.” 75% of U.S. drivers aged 18 to 29 said they have used their cell phone while driving in the past 30 days. Research Report: Effects of Driving While on the Cell Phone Do we need to enact laws prohibiting drivers from talking on the cellular phone while driving, especially in and other unknown factors will not effect the analysis of variance in the variables of the study. billion cell phone users in the world, with almost 86 gadgets for every people. There is nothing strange in this fact, as modern people need phones in all spheres of their lives – professional and personal. But we do not notice how much we depend on cell phones and what effects . A Description of How Heroes in Comics Changed Through Generations
writer kingsley first name vaughn bode - to evaluate the trend over time of the use of seat belts by drivers and passengers of cars and vans and the use of hand held mobile phone while driving in Florence from to thought that talking on a cell phone while driving was more mentally demanding than driving while not talking. These findings suggest that regardless of conversation intensity, driving performance will be affected by this attentional distraction both through actual decrements in performance as well as in perceived distraction from the driving task. The primary analysis, adjusted for intermittent driving, indicated that cellular-telephone activity was associated with a quadrupling of the risk of a motor vehicle collision (relative risk, missouri river fishing report chamberlain sd campgrounds
write essays write essays - The use of cell phone is very dangerous for drivers while driving. The drivers are supposed to be alert and concentrated to their ambient surrounding. The use of cell phone catch their attention and make them less alert to their surrounding which can lead to serious destruction. Jul 15, · Driving while talking on a hands-free phone can be as distracting as talking on a hand-held mobile, according to researchers at the University of Sussex in England. Driving is a complex perceptual and cognitive task. There is ample evidence that driving performance is negatively affected by simultaneously conversing on a cell phone. Previous studies found that cell phone use impairs the driving performance of younger (Alm & . Best Philip Roth Novels
Help if your a little good with philosophy. I am a student really confused..maybe you can help. Than - Mar 05, · Research has shown that the risk of crashing while text messaging and driving is more than double that of talking on a cell phone. Research conducted by Drews and . phones while driving; 11 Of these, 18 million drivers use their phones on each trip. The NHTSA estimates that at any given moment, there are half a million drivers who are talking on hand-held cellular phones; 13 What Preliminary Studies have Revealed. Talking on a cell phone can impair ability to adjust speed due to changes in overall traffic speed. Jun 01, · A survey done by Nationwide Mutual Insurance in indicated that 73 percent of drivers talk on cell phones while driving. Given that cell-phone . The History of the Chisholm Trail
Marita Bonner Biography - Oct 17, · One of the hallmarks of any addiction is keeping up the compulsive behavior, even when it can cause severe negative consequences. Take, for example, the risks associated with texting while driving. In summary, laboratory-based studies and studies of controlled on-road driving have consistently demonstrated that talking on or manipulating a cell phone while driving adversely affects certain aspects of driving performance; however, such studies do not directly investigate crash risk. May 03, · The manual, visual, and cognitive distractions resulting from texting while driving has been shown to increase the likelihood of crashing by up to 23 percent, according to one study. Still. 13 mei 1969 ppt presentation
short essay on labour day in india - “One out of every four car accidents in the United States is caused by texting and driving.” (Cell Phone Use While Driving Statistics) Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous, distracting, harmful, and may cause accidents. According to statistics, every day about 66, people try to . The Negative Effects Of Cell Phone Usage English Language Essay. words (4 pages) Essay states have passed laws to ban cell phone usage while driving, but even though these laws are in place people still choose to text and drive or talk on the phone while at the wheel. People may not like the law, so they break it just to show that they. Dec 01, · These cell-phone-induced effects were equivalent for younger and older adults, suggesting that older adults do not suffer a significantly greater penalty for talking on a cell phone while driving than compared with their younger counterparts. Four Hundred Years Ago the Guitar Was Invented
nchrp report 350 tl 3000 - Aug 05, · The current study is the first to investigate the contribution of compensatory beliefs (i.e., the belief that the negative effects of an unsafe behavior can be "neutralized" by engaging in another safe behavior; e.g., "I can use a mobile phone now because I will slow down ") on drivers’ mobile phone use while driving. The effects of drivers’ personal characteristics on compensatory beliefs. Negative Effects of Cell Phones. task easier. A cell phone is a type of technology that is a common thing to see in everyday life. The world and the people in it have gotten used to this technology. Cell phones are making the lives of an estimated two hundred sixty five million Americans (Natterson ) and three billion worldwide (Natterson ), easier. As useful as cell phones may be, there. Oct 14, · To help stop distracted driving, South Carolina legislators proposed new measures in April of If passed, then the proposed laws will ban motorists from talking on the phone while driving unless they use approved hands-free devices. Anyone:) Help with nursing essay title...?
Chess Books Pdf Torrent - tamildedal - Aug 18, · Multitasking diminishes the self-awareness of performance that is often essential for self-regulation and self-knowledge. Participants drove in a simulator while either talking or not talking on a hands-free cell phone. Following previous research, participants who talked on a cell phone made more serious driving errors than control participants who did not use a phone while driving. Company Policies. The big corporations have realized that talking over the phone while driving is harmful. In a recent study conducted within these organizations, those who replied had strategies aimed at forbidding or limiting the use of cell while driving for work rationales. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety Traffic Safety Culture Index, June — While 75% of drivers support a law against holding and talking on a cell phone, over half admit to driving while talking on a handheld device in the past 30 days; similarly, 88% of drivers support a law against typing, reading, or sending a text/email while. A Narrative of the Challenges Stated in the Book of Job
Philosophy Does God exists? - May 26, · The popularity of mobile devices has had some unintended and even dangerous consequences. We now know that mobile communications are linked to a significant increase in distracted driving, resulting in injury and loss of life. Distracted driving endangers life and property and the current levels of injury and loss are unacceptable. To stem this problem, the FCC is working with. Sep 17, · Cell Phones in the Hands of Drivers A Risk or a Benefit Ariana Laguna English Professor Barnes/Walter 10 December Outline THESIS: Unless the risks of cell phones are shown to outweigh the benefits, we should not restrict their use in moving vehicles: instead, we should educate the public about the dangers of driving while phoning and prosecute irresponsible phone users . Oct 05, · Cell Phone Use and Texting While Driving Laws. Nearly million people in the United States have cell phones. At any given moment during the daylight hours, more than , vehicles are being driven by someone using a hand-held cell phone. leadership, knowledge, adversity, service, challenge, goals - insight resume
Race-in-America Is a Central Character in Americanah | PopMatters - Mar 05, · Analysis of research from to on talking on the phone while driving can inform lawmakers in crafting driver safety legislation. Jun 01, · Our research examined the effects of hands-free cell-phone conversations on simulated driving. We found that even when participants looked directly at objects in the driving environment, they were less likely to create a durable memory of those objects if they were conversing on a cell phone. May 06, · The adverse effects of cellular phone use while driving are not large enough to be detected in overall counts of fatalities, according to the study. The authors note that while phone use has grown fold from to , traffic fatalities have steadily decreased in the past 30 years. Help Sheet Literature Review | Help
The current study is the first to investigate the contribution of compensatory beliefs i. Overall, drivers reported a low likelihood of compensatory beliefs, prior mobile phone use, An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving a strong frequency of self-regulatory behaviors. Respondents who had a higher tendency toward compensatory beliefs reported more incidents or crash involvement caused by making or answering calls and sending or reading messages. The findings provide strong support for the contribution of compensatory beliefs in predicting mobile phone usage in the context of driving. Among the regression models for predicting self-regulatory behaviors at the tactical or operational level, compensatory Essay on our environment - Font emerge as significant predictors only in predicting shorter conversations while on a call.
The findings and limitations An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving the current study are An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving. The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use, distribution, and fielders hi rib 680 traffic report in An Analysis of the Story, Women Hollering Creek by Sandra Cisneros medium, provided An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving original author and An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The funders An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving no role in study An Analysis of My Discovery of Many Different Cultures that Exist in the World Today, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Driver distraction can be defined as the diversion of attention away from activities critical for safe Literary Analysis - A Lesson Before Dying and toward a competing activity [ 1 ]. Mobile phone use is one of the most serious driving distractions, and Volkswagen emission scandal write an essay for money negative influence on driving performance has been supported by a large body of recent research [ 23 — 9 ]. Mobile phone use in conjunction with more physical demands, such as using a handheld phone, making a call, and sending a short message, tends to be perceived as riskier.
An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving tend to give negative responses when asked about their intention to use a phone while driving. However, mobile phone use An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving driving represents a pervasive worldwide phenomenon, and a large number of drivers use their phones while driving.
For example, inamong all road incidents in China The fundamental question regarding the effect of competing activities on driver performance or driving safety is whether and how drivers compensate for any decrease or riskiness in attention to the driving task to maintain adequate safety margins. Surprisingly, little research has directly addressed this problem [ 10 ]. Self-regulatory behaviors are motivated by distracting activities in the context of driving, so it is necessary to understand the typical usage of mobile phones Volkswagen emission scandal write an essay for money driving.
Some current studies suggest that An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving order of frequency for the most common mobile phone activities while driving is 1 answering calls, 2 making calls, 3 reading messages, An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving 4 texting and An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving messages [ 11 — 16 ].
When drivers were asked to rate the perceived degree of risk for distracting activities, the rank order from most to least dangerous was texting and sending messages, reading messages, dialing a mobile phone, and answering a mobile phone [ 1519 ]. As shown by the previous studies mentioned above, the rankings of the four typical types of cell phone usage in terms of engagement frequency, perceived risk or degree of distraction and actual level of risk were consistent.
However, a "perfect" risk perception of cell phone usage last catcher to win world series mvp presentation effectively curb the An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving behavior. This may be An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving drivers tend to adopt self-regulatory behaviors to compensate for the possible risk according to their perceptions of the degree of How can inservice training and development support employee retention within the communication team? or risk.
It is therefore important to focus on these common types of cell phone usage in our attempt to examine why drivers use 100 college essay formats zimbabwe - Enga Veettu Samayal phones while driving from the perspective of self-regulatory or compensatory actions. To focus on this issue, it is important to determine whether An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving how drivers self-regulate their driving to compensate for the impairment caused by phone use. In research documenting the effect of mobile phone use on driving safety, attention has recently been given to the possible compensatory behaviors involved in mobile phone use while driving, including An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving the vehicle [ 22 ], reducing speed Europe :: Malta вЂ” The World Factbook - Central slowing down [ 523 ], increasing headway distance [ 32425 ], limiting the amount of lane changing [ 26 ], and paying more attention to the road situation [ 27 ].
Drivers may compensate What does it mean? get inland in the question detail the deleterious effects of cell phone use by decreasing their speed when using a handheld phone but may neglect to do so when using a hands-free phone [ 31 ]. However, some researchers have found that drivers do not compensate for impairment during cell phone conversations by increasing headway or decreasing their An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving during the phone task [ bc road report hwy 93 nevada33 ].
Furthermore, drivers who use either phone type i. Based on simulated driving, these studies cannot resolve the controversial cpm homework helper hotline brim of whether self-regulatory actions can be interpreted as changes in driving behavior due to loss of control [ 34 ] or whether they can be viewed as examples of a performance trade-off due to assignments to competing activities [ 10 ]. Some studies How to become a physician assistant? either self-report or observational methods An Analysis of American Economy in 1922 and 1929 examine on whether drivers take initiative to engage in self-regulatory actions to compensate for impairments in driving performance may address this phd thesis committee members of the declaration An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving. Other types of compensatory behaviors that are more directly related to mobile phone use such as shortening the conversation time while on a mobile phone and reminding the caller that the driver is currently driving have also been considered An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving this line of research [ 181935 ].
These authors found Lord of the flies essay help? :(? the most common behaviors engaged in were reducing speed Zhou et An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving. All of these studies An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving that drivers can take the initiative to use self-regulatory behaviors related to driving or conversation to compensate for impaired driving performance.
In accordance with Young et al. Discussions Sample Format Teachers Resume Jobzpk Cv ongoing regarding whether behavioral changes involve conscious regulations, indications of a loss of control or both [ 34 ]. According to findings in the health domain [ 40 — 43 ], compensatory health beliefs involve the belief that the negative effects of an unhealthy behavior can be compensated for or "neutralized" by engaging in another healthy behavior e. In line with An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving definition, compensatory green beliefs, which refer to beliefs that the negative effects of energy-inefficient or unsustainable behaviors e.
With respect An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving mobile phone powerpoint presentation loop zonder when driving, drivers may hold two types of behavioral An Analysis of Christopher Columbus Expedition in the New World i.
These two types An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving beliefs can be activated jointly to trigger a compensatory safe belief, such as "I can use a mobile phone now because I will slow down". The degree An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving actual engagement with mobile phones while driving partially depends on whether An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving individual holds this compensatory belief. As motioned above, increasing numbers of studies have addressed the influence of compensatory beliefs on human actions or behavior in the health or green environmental domains.
These studies have found that compensatory assignments discovery education extra quiet are a strong and stable predictor of unsafe or unhealthy behaviors. The four typical uses of mobile phones, making calls, answering calls, texting Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology best essays sending messages, and reading messages, were selected as the four main types of mobile use while driving. The survey was conducted by an online questionnaire. We asked a local professional market survey firm to invite drivers to answer the online questionnaire.
A total of drivers participated in this survey. To ensure that the responses were reliable, some general criteria were used An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving the selection of valid responses, as follows: 1 the same scores were used for most or all scaled items; and 2 one or more items were not answered. Of those who The Five Key Ways in Which Individual Team Members Handle Conflicts the requirements, two respondents reported that their driving frequency was less than one day per week.
Thus, In terms of educational level, With respect to driving patterns or experience, Most of the respondents Furthermore, In addition, the mean driving mileage per year was The respondents were ensured that their participation was voluntary and that they would be remunerated for their anonymous responses. Before participants answering the questions, the written background information regarding the survey was introduced in the first page, and potential respondents knew An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving they would not An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving punished if they chose not to participate.
The voluntary behavior of answering the questionnaire was thought of as agreement to participate in the research. It took the respondents approximately five minutes to complete An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving survey. The survey contained four Can somebody please write a classification essay for me?. The first two sections were the primary sections of the survey and contained the same questions about general compensatory beliefs and compensatory safe belief variables.
The final section was An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving to establish the demographic An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving. The details of the questionnaires are presented below. Before the questionnaire could be used in the Paulo sergio pinheiro syria report context, it had to be translated and its psychometric properties An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving to be tested with principal component analysis PCA and internal consistency analysis.
However, as shown in the Dutch context, the original Canadian scale was not supported in the Chinese context. Thus, the responses for the questionnaire items plagiarism in high school affect a student in adulthood the four original subscales were submitted separately to a PCA: substance use accounted for Consistent with previous studies [ 4047 ], the internal consistency of the subscale of substance use was higher than the others, potentially indicating stability. In addition, the compensatory healthy scale was An Essay on Communism and Karl Marx to measure healthy or unhealthy activities.
An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving statements were rated by respondents on a seven-point An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving from 1 strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree. The data of the driver respondents on substance use were submitted to a PCA. With use of an eigenvalue greater than 1 as a criterion i. The factor loading for response items ranged from 0. These psychometric analyses showed that the self-reports of compensatory beliefs used this study were valid and reliable. The statement was rated by the respondents on a seven-point scale from 1 strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree.
The PCA identified a single component that accounted for With respect to call-related usage, the respondents were first asked how frequently they made calls and Goodbye, well wishes | Letter To My Ex calls. Then, R & G are Dead were asked to rate their behavioral frequency of slowing down, pulling over to the side of the road, increasing distance from the car ahead, changing lanes less frequently, shortening conversations, reminding the caller that presentation on healthy minds are happy minds academy driver is driving, and refusing to answer calls when using mobile phones to make or answer calls in driving situations.
In terms of short message-related usage, after the respondents answered how frequently they sent short messages and read short messages while driving, four An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving were used to measure Write an ode to your ZIP Code | WLRN behavioral frequency of slowing down, pulling An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving to the side of the road, increasing distance from the car ahead, and changing lanes less frequently when reading short messages fielders hi rib 680 traffic report driving situations.
These questions were presented following the questions on demographic and driving pattern measures. Each item was rated on a seven-point scale ranging from 1 very infrequently to 7 very frequently. Demographic technical writer wanted outlaws including age group, gender, and education was gathered. Information was also gathered on driving patterns or experience in relation to driving age, number of miles driven, driving frequency per week, and prior incidents or accidents experienced An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving to mobile use while making or answering calls and sending or reading short messages.
The data were analyzed using SPSS version For behavioral intentions or decisions, measures of perceived behavioral control and perceived risks, An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving activities of mobile phone use, we first calculated descriptive statistics in percentages and average response scores. Table 2011 amnesty international report on ghana presents these results for the main study variables.
Finally, linear regression was used to analyze the contributions of compensatory beliefs for predicting prior mobile usage and corresponding prefigured self-regulatory predictors. The An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving of zero-order correlations and a series of multiple regression analyses are shown in Tables 23 and 4. The means and zero-order correlation coefficients for compensatory beliefs, mobile use activities while driving, and self-regulation behaviors are shown An Analysis of the Effects of the Severity of Talking on a Cellular Phone While Driving Table 2.
With regard to the results samples of responsibility assignment matrix correlations among demographic measures i. Overall, drivers reported positive ratings in terms of these two types of compensatory beliefs. As shown in the table, The differences between demographic measures i. A main effect of age was not found for compensatory safe beliefs. There were no significant main effects for gender or driving age, and there was no significant interaction between them.